Modesty is not just an external issue, and It’s not just a ladies issue either.

This is a hot button topic that has been getting plenty of attention recently for at least 2 reasons.

  • Matthew West’s production of a single called “Modest is Hottest”
  • The summertime is in full swing and it’s plenty hot outside.

As with most years, many of the lessons on modesty taught in our churches, can rapidly be deconstructed to targeting the ladies while the silence around the gentlemen is deafening. This lack of balance provides those with less awareness or understanding just enough surface knowledge that they feel qualified to make extremely hurtful statements around instances of sexual abuse.

The hurtful statement(s) being referred to: “what were you wearing” or “what was she wearing”

The question of, “what were you wearing?” should not be one that is uttered especially in our churches. Unfortunately, it has been heard far too many times. What an individual was wearing has nothing to do with another individuals decision to instigate a sexual assault.

Let’s consider what that question claims. It claims that one’s choice in wardrobe was directly responsible for someone else’s decisions. Have we not all learned by now that the only person you can control is yourself?

What a survivor was wearing has nothing to do with the fact that another individual chose to forcibly assault them. What about when the survivor is a child? Are we blaming the outfit (read parents) for what others did? There is no shortage of parents who have been asked what their child was wearing when their child was abused. What an incredibly insensitive question to ask. Unfortunately, this is one that will be asked by even the sweetest of people in a congregation that have had the privilege of being unaware of those around them who have experienced sexual assault who are unaware that 20% of those they sit with on Sunday morning have experienced sexual abuse.

There is a museum exhibit traveling around the country to different universities debunking the myth that what an individual wears has anything to do with sexual assault. Sure, some of the outfits in the exhibit could inspire the typical sermon on modesty, but many others would have been approved by a preacher should his daughter have been dressed in a similar outfit. The thought that what someone was wearing when assaulted was the cause of the assault needs to be done away with in our churches. An assault has NOTHING to do with what someone was wearing, it has far more to do with what was going on in the perpetrator’s mind.

Could it be that our churches have been horribly imbalanced in how modesty is taught? Where are the lessons focused on the inward issues that deal with modesty AND thought life been? Where have the lessons regarding “taking our thoughts captive” (2 Cor 10:5) been? Where have the lessons been to the men on what are they teaching their sons? Where are the lessons discussing appropriate thought life for the Christian male?

There is a place for balance in the teaching that goes on in our churches regarding modesty because it is both an internal and external issue. There is room to teach on thought life and external modesty. One addresses the external and the other addresses arguably the more hidden and important internal practices. Job addressed thought life in 31:1 in the ESV the word used is gaze. “I have made a covenant with my eyes; how could I gaze at a virgin?” In Matthew 5:21-30 in the Sermon on the Mount, Christ addressed the importance of our thought life. “Do not get angry” and “Do not lust”, were statements where Christ knew the origin of the outward sin that man commits. Should we not take note that we must focus on our inward thought life that nobody sees as well as what we do outwardly that everyone can see?

How many have heard a lesson pointed at the men addressing their thought life? We know there are scriptures to back a lesson such as that up. Have they been heard as often as the lessons on modesty aimed at the ladies? Why the deficiency?

With the statistics in the United States today being at a minimum 20% of the population having experienced sexual assault before 18, what are we telling the survivors in our pews? How is such an imbalance survivor friendly? It is not a stretch for a survivor to feel as if they are being blamed for what happened to them with such emphasis on outward clothing without discussion of what one’s mind is clothed with.

When teaching on modesty there is a lesson to be had for the external AND the internal.  Without balance our churches and families will continue to emphasize what our daughters and sisters are wearing without touching the corrosive thoughts going through the heads of so many boys and men who feel entitled.

The thirst for strong leaders

A recent Christian article stated the need for obedience to the leaders of the congregation that one attends rather than shopping for a new place to worship should a disagreement with leadership arise. It is factually correct and squares with scripture assuming the leadership of your local congregation is following the scripture and the law. It is at that point that the church leadership of the congregation which you attend may deviate from scripture, their duty to protect the flock, and the local, state, and federal laws where one can come into disagreement with the author of the article.

 Beyond disagreement, it is at the point of deviation that if left unchecked congregational leadership may weaponize scriptures about their authority in order to control an individual or family impacted by abuse. Hebrews 13:17 “Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are watching over your souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you.” The previous verse along with the first part of I Peter 5:5, “Likewise, you who are younger, be subject to the elders.” Is the perfect recipe for a young family to be cajoled into submission by those who are supposed to protect them but choose to not investigate or investigate on their own an accusation of abuse. Those who have endured abusive situations will hear these verses in a weaponized fashion if the action they take to protect themselves or their children is contrary to the advice or prescription given by the leadership of the congregation they attend.

A common scenario in an incident of abuse aftermath within a congregation comes in four steps very often with the leadership in full knowledge. 1. The abusive act is minimized if the survivor is believed at all. 2. The survivor is told they must “forgive” which really means that the survivor must act exactly as they did prior to abuse in the presence of the abuser. 3. Any mention of law enforcement involvement by the survivor or their family is met with cries of unforgiveness and statements of condemnation in earthly and spiritual arenas. 4. Silence, the abuse and abuser must not be spoken of.  Let’s remember here that most of the time that when the term unforgiveness is thrown around everyone involved is still wrapping their head around the totality of the events that have occurred. If one is still wrapping their head around the events that they or their child endured, it is too early to forgive and space is needed to evaluate exactly what is being forgiven.

This type of behavior in congregations and congregational leadership leads to a conclusion that must be considered. Have some congregations inadvertently become the church in Corinth described in I Corinthians? Paul in I Corinthians 5 states that immorality that is not even tolerated among the pagans was being accepted in the church at Corinth. It is difficult to think of any act more immoral than the sexual abuse of a child yet, if one considers the four steps mentioned earlier, tolerance, acceptance and perhaps enablement are words that come to mind. It is well documented that child predators and rapists in prison are not safe and that other inmates have been known to harass, injure, or murder the predators and rapists. Those who are thieves, deal drugs, and physically violent do not tolerate what is tolerated in many congregations today. With this knowledge, one must conclude that without the right leadership, a congregation can easily be a I Corinthians 5 congregation of the modern day.

Beyond the comparison to I Corinthians 5, the failure to report such crimes which is covered earlier in the four common steps is a violation of the law in most cases. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services there are 48 states that have mandatory reporting laws regarding child abuse. Each state is different, but it is safe to say if the leadership of a church is aware of an abusive situation and they are not reporting it the odds are pretty good that the local laws are being violated. Now consider Romans 13:1-2, “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God. Therefore, whoever resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgement.” If the leadership of a congregation is discouraging reporting abuse rather than helping to report it or encouraging silence rather than exposing evil as found in Ephesians 5:11, their deeds are contrary to their calling and serious self-reflection is in order.

This is the point at which those who have been faithful members of a congregation for years may decide to seek other places to attend services. This search for another church home is not consumeristic, but rather a search for a congregation with leaders who are obedient to the scriptures including the previously mentioned Ephesians 5:11 and Romans 13. At this point a family seeking another church home is very much like a group of spiritual refugees seeking relief from what they had endured.  Therefore, there is no disobedience if the family is seeking a church home that will not ridicule them for pursuing justice for a predator that abused their child rather than becoming amenable to leadership that will not expose darkness or do what legally should be done in the case of abuse.

Leaders, if there is an outcry of abuse within the flock you are to oversee, you must take it seriously. You are not the only watchmen of your flock, but by your title and role you should be leading the way when it comes to challenging decisions.  When an abuse allegation arrives, it is your opportunity to lead. Very often leaders are called to make difficult decisions, and, in this case, it will be one of the most challenging times of your life. It will be difficult for a myriad of reasons including the fact that predators are often well known and liked within a congregational setting. Predators often use their relationships and likeability to create built in doubt once an accusation is made. If a leader does what is right in these instances, they will be challenged by those who lack complete understanding of the situation. It is normal in these situations for the predator to stir up those who would make a leader’s job difficult. It is because of these many challenges that often leaders follow the siren’s song to cover up an incident. The conundrum for making the correct decision can be avoided through leaders making the decision to create a set of policies dictating what actions to take when abusive situations arise.

  1. Any accusation of abuse will be reported and investigated by local authorities.
  2. No effort will be made to investigate an instance of abuse from any party within this congregation.
  3. Full cooperation will be afforded to the authorities.
  4. Any investigation that concludes that abuse likely occurred will be communicated to the congregation for the protection of the children who regularly attend or visit the congregation.
  5. Known predators that wish to attend services will be offered alternative services online or within their home.

The darkest situations that we face in life are the very reasons that we need godly leadership of our local churches. Wise caring shepherds that care for those of the flock are an integral part of that equation. Those who are leaders of a congregation that choose to not lead by obedience to the scripture have a difficult position to defend. Simply put: Shepherds, if you want your sheep to loyally follow, Lead.

How real is the issue?

Since beginning the Ezekiel 33 Project one question I have received by many is, “How big is the issue really?”. My first inclination is to respond that the question is the wrong on to be asking given the serious life long challenges that come with childhood sexual abuse. My second thought is that perhaps real numbers have not been analyzed or considered by those of faith. Below is a brief presentation as to why the Ezekiel 33 Project exists and what its purpose is.

To a survivor, April 2020 is either a blessing or a curse.

April is sexual assault awareness month and things are different. We are mostly confined to our homes as we wait for our local, state, and federal authorities to determine for us all when we get back to how we lived previous to this virus arriving. This virus has done one of two things for those who have endured abuse prior to coronavirus becoming such a common phrase in our daily lexicon.

For those who endured abuse where they live, the shutdowns and limitations on movement ensure that they will be in the presence of their abuser more often and may get little respite from their presence and abuse during this time. These are the ones that will endure acts that are horrific while the rest of the nation complains about the lack of being able to go to their favorite restaurant or get a haircut. When this ends these are the ones that could make an outcry for help as they seek to escape the nightmare of who they had to be near to for the duration of the emergency declarations. When the restrictions end, those who have close contact with children should be especially mindful of what a child may have endured while isolated in their home.

Those who endured abuse outside of their home during these shutdowns are likely content with the situation as they do not have to be in the presence of or endure the abuse of those who have abused them before the restrictions on movement were put in place. This could an opportunity for those in the home to listen to why a child does not wish to be around an extended family member, day care worker, church volunteer, minister, or family friend. The reason could be silly or serious. Children often have strange reasons for not wanting to be around someone which could seem suspicious.  Many times, one might find their child does not like a trait that someone else has rather than having experienced an abusive situation. Other times a child may not want to be around an individual that they previously loved being around. If there is a significant age difference, the reason for this should be probed further.

Both type of survivor described above deserve to have someone who is watching out for them, an individual who looks out for their best interests even when there is pressure to look the other way. What they are looking for and what the world needs more of are good watchmen who will sound the alarm when things do not look right. The most challenging skill a good watchman must acquire is the ability to speak and take a stand against a group that wishes to remain silent and do nothing. A good watchman lives Ephesians 5:11 by not only avoiding evil deeds, but also exposing them. As it appears as if the month of April will be past when most of the country is able to freely move about let’s not forget to be aware for those who have endured sexual assault.

Scheduling announcement

Due to the significant challenges that we are currently facing as a result of the Covid-19 virus all currently scheduled workshops and seminars are postponed. As events are re-scheduled, new dates will be posted.

What? Your congregation or organization had not scheduled a seminar? Let’s talk about the benefits of hosting one and begin making plans for late summer or fall of 2020.

Abusive situations and love bombing.

Love bombing is a term that has been out there for some time but has recently received more attention from abuse advocates such as Sarah McDugal. In exploring this topic and considering its uses in the case of child sexual abuse within a family or a church, at first one might consider that love bombing is reserved for romantic relationships between adults where the manipulative individual showers the other with praise, adoration, and gifts. Upon closer examination, one can note that the grooming process where a predator manipulates a child is also often love bombing. The manipulator creates a relationship where the child craves the “love” that they will endure the abuse to gain the praise and adoration. This is a powerful technique because love bombing targets the desire to receive praise and attention. Especially a child getting adoration and praise from someone significantly older than they are. When we look closely, we can quickly see that love bombing is not the love we find in I Corinthians 13.

I Corinthians 13. “If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal. And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give away all I have, and if I deliver up my body to be burned,[a] but have not love, I gain nothing.

Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful;[b] it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. 11 When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. 12 For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known.

13 So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love.”

At the tail end of I Corinthians 13:4 one will find that love does not insist on its own way, and that love is not irritable or resentful. When boiling it down love bombing is a manipulative tactic where gifts, adoration and affection are used to reel in individuals so they will act a way that the love bomber wants them to act. When things do not go as the love bomber plans, one can see that the “love” that had been offered was never true love as described in I Corinthians 13.

In cases where abuse is occurring and a child has not spoken out, a predator will likely love bomb the family of the child that they are abusing. This will often be done in the full view of others and will use these acts of kindness to deflect accusations should they arise. Very often these deflections will come by those who witnessed the acts of “kindness” meaning that the heavy lifting is left to others to defend the predator. This allows the predator to sit back, observe others defending the indefensible because of some acts of kindness they performed. This also pretty well seals that they will be able to continue to abuse because the next person will think twice before making an accusation.

In situations of secondary abuse, those aligned with an abuser will shower the survivor or their loved ones with attention and unwanted gifts. It is not until later when a request is made to be in the presence of the abuser, or a request not to prosecute is made that the trap is realized. The trap is the realization that the gifts and adoration were really a bribe to buy the acceptance of the abuser, or of those aligned with the abuser. Either answer in a situation such as this is uncomfortable. If one goes against their conscience and chooses the side for the abuser which could lead to further abuse. On the other hand, to decline the individual who has been showering gifts and praise, is uncomfortable. This is the intention of the love bomber. This discomfort is secondary abuse that is being thrown in an individual’s direction.

With the holidays fast approaching, are you, or your child being love bombed? Are you shown ample affection if your plans are the plans that others want you to have? Have you deviated from the desires of others and received an angry outburst and the affection that you had received so richly cease? You could be dealing with a love bomber who is working to manipulate you or your family.

Harding University Lectureship 2019

Yesterday I had the pleasure of serving on a panel at the Harding University Bible Lectureship discussing sexual abuse in Churches of Christ led by Bobby Ross Jr. of the Christian Chronicle. Christine Fox Parker and Chellie Ison joined were on the panel with me. We discussed abuse, its prevalence, how it has been handled, and recommended ways of handling abusers within a congregation. From this discussion there were four things that stand out as highlights from the conversation.

Abuse is far more prevalent than anyone cares to admit.

Churches should prepare for when this will happen and have contacts to refer survivors to when abuse is reported.

Those who abuse are deceptive and manipulative not only to their victim but to all in their victim’s world.

Alternative worship opportunities should be put in place to serve the spiritual needs of offenders in an environment that does not have children.

The audiences were fantastic and had excellent questions in the question and answer session.  Audio is available on the audio page found under “Events”.